![]() |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| ||||
| This thread is for discussions stemming from the EPMFAQ Blog post entitled Fixed Duration Tasks in Project 2007. I'm interested in knowing the impact of this change across the EPM Community. How has this change affected you, your projects, and your organization? In your plans, how were you using tasks with Duration but no Work? Let's discuss the reasons behind this use case so that we can come up with alternative ways of structuring projects in order to avoid this problem.
__________________ Stephen Sanderlin Founder/Owner - EPMFAQ Principal Consultant - MSProjectExperts If you found this message useful, please click the Thanks button in the post! This electronic message, along with any information, advice, and opinions it contains, are mine alone and are not representative of my employer. All information is provided in "GOOD FAITH" and on an "AS IS" basis only. I provide no presentations or warranties, express or implied, including implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose, merchantability, title, and noninfringement. I strongly advise you to extensively test any changes, workarounds, or techniques described herein on a development system prior to implementation in a production environment, and you are hereby notified that I bear no responsibility whatsoever for any loss, harm, or otherwise negative outcomes resulting from your actions, whether or not said actions were a result of this electronic message, directly or indirectly. |
| Sponsored links |
| |
| |||
| No matter how well a project is sequenced things change. Sometimes this change means accomplishing tasks out of sequence. It has been helpfull for fixed duration non work effort projects to roll up 0hrs to summary. I also get to enjoy watching the finish date pull back at the same time. Why make it more difficult then that. Have you tried to load Project 2007, fixed duration, non work effort project resource information and share it across Project 2000, 2003, and 2007 users. Morph is the only term that describes the results. Microsoft! If it's not broken don't fix it.... |
| |||
| My customer is an immature organisation just introducing project management and using a PPM tool to drive it. They create fixed duration tasks because they are managing the start and end dates without concerning themselves who is allocated to the tasks. In other words they manage time and not effort. This makes it impossible for them to use MSP. Open Workbench might be a better option ! |
| ||||
| Quote:
__________________ Stephen Sanderlin Founder/Owner - EPMFAQ Principal Consultant - MSProjectExperts If you found this message useful, please click the Thanks button in the post! This electronic message, along with any information, advice, and opinions it contains, are mine alone and are not representative of my employer. All information is provided in "GOOD FAITH" and on an "AS IS" basis only. I provide no presentations or warranties, express or implied, including implied warranties of fitness for a particular purpose, merchantability, title, and noninfringement. I strongly advise you to extensively test any changes, workarounds, or techniques described herein on a development system prior to implementation in a production environment, and you are hereby notified that I bear no responsibility whatsoever for any loss, harm, or otherwise negative outcomes resulting from your actions, whether or not said actions were a result of this electronic message, directly or indirectly. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|